Movies vs TV Series: Which is better

Since the production of the first movie, premiered by Roundhay Garden Scene in 1888 over 130 years ago, the film industry has been attracting audiences from a wide range of backgrounds. Its younger sibling TV did not arrive until the late 1920s, but both beacons were in rivalry with one another from the 1940s onward. Historically, the film got more glamour and acclamation, but we have witnessed what many people consider ‘The Golden Age of Television’ in the last decade or so. Because of larger budgets, more special effects, and networks, such as HBO and Netflix, television shows have become more cinematic than ever. It would show the next step of the competition between film and television. Even cable providers pay much attention to these TV shows e.g., Cox cable TV offers thousands of On-demand choices for subscribers to select from, making television their main selling point.

Let’s now see the detailed comparison between the Movies and TV series.


Films and shows are all incredibly costly. Nevertheless, they will still earn even more by selling tickets and advertising. The consequences of TV have definitely come a long way since the unofficial Golden Era started, but over an entire season, they have to break up a multimillion-dollar budget, while a movie would spend it for a mere two-hour show. It ensures that the picture continues to look great with CGI and other effects. There is also a time limit on which TV is more probable. Because several episodes are expected for a show each year, they have to be completed much quicker. This will contribute to hurried effects and the desire to capture all in the studio, whereas, films offer a feeling of reality and have scope for filming on the location.

Storyline and characters

Even though the film is restricted to at most a couple of hours, it has always been capable of conveying brilliant stories. Movie Film outlets such as Star Wars and the Marvel Cinematic Universe have excelled to convey lengthy storylines and more and more actors. So although in the field of cinema that is rare, for years, prolonged storylines have been the bread and butter for TV series. The audience has seen characters evolve and expand, season after season, from comedies like The Office and Parks and Rec to plays like Mad Men & Breaking Bad and horror or fantasy or like The Walking Dead and Game of Thrones.

This seems like interacting with the protagonists each year, plus so much more in real life. However, that may be a drawback. In situations like The Walking Dead, so long can be taken and the last will seem endlessly replicated every season. Sequels in the series have done the same for decades, to be honest. Nevertheless, TV shows tend to conquer the genre of long storytelling.

Let’s see why TV is considered to be better than movies!

Prolonged Storyline

The expanded potential for the narrative of TV beat film when appropriately implemented depends strongly on the drudgery of three-act storylines lasting 90 minutes. Breaking Bad revealed a role that could never be accomplished in film over two years of his life. The crime became a mere homicide investigation over 20 hours. So look at The Returned or Buffy the Vampire Slayer – each of them started off in the cinemas with a fluff that was quickly overlooked but did not thrive until they find the time and place the TV provided.

With constant series and spinoffs and reboots, Hollywood depends more and more on name awareness as it is simpler than a fresh ad strategy. TV is far more excited about something new. Sure, clouds are on the horizon we have a Television series from Avengers and perhaps we will have spin-offs from the Modern Family, Breaking Bad, The Walking Dead, and even Dexter to try for signs of survival-but now entertainment is the best.

TV has the potential to progress

A Freeform TV series that switches from satire to suspense, back and forth is much better. Films that need to be properly marketed with their desperate need tend to simplify sales. There were no other limitations in a series like Breaking Bad. And if you chuckled in one chapter, you could hyperventilate the next. Each time of the show was a rollercoaster and a uniquely televised.

Word of Mouth

Let’s once again take Breaking Bad as an example. The series started tiny until it ended up becoming the juggernaut, with modern strategies for delivery until nearly wild word-of-mouth from evangelists who watched and enjoyed it. What do you think about the last movie you watched? That’s must be an old movie which wasn’t that successful in the studio’s ability to drain the bones dry with endless series.

Actors do a lot better on TV

Because television is more and more a platform for the actor, it draws the best acting talent. Actors who went from TV a decade ago now embrace it precisely because its quality is so high. Now it is time for the actors to switch from TV to script. In The Shield, Michael Chiklis played a turd-shaped superhero despite his bruising. The ropey thriller of Beyoncé, Idris Elba followed The Wire. First appearance for Aaron Paul in a film about a video game about some vehicles since his turn towering Jesse Pinkman.